memyselfnie

To  just define the word, I’ll be honest (ha-ha), I took to webster’s

definition, (morally good),  even that lacked something.  What was

missing was the consent of the governed, the other guy’s understanding

and assent too.  One could say something and be so convinced of

their own definition  (self-righteousness) to seem holier-than-thou,

but when that other guy says “yeah, you’re right”, he can’t argue.  After all

is said and done, being self-righteous doesn’t mean you’re wrong,

just a little smug and intolerant of another’s opinion.

One can be so convinced and confident , but it never makes agreement.

It takes more than one, that’s the moral of this crap.

So what’s the evidence?

Not pithy, spinning spin.

Not just one side either, ya can’t have a morally good without a morally bad,

it really comes down to an agreement of what’s moral, right?

What’s good and what’s bad, what’s right and what’s wrong,

then two is one.

It may not always be widely known, but it’s still there.  We spin,

obfuscate, out and out lie, conceal, try and spend it, save it, change it,

do all we think we know we can, it’s still there, in fact, it’s the only thing

that still is, was, and always will be, no matter what, who, where, or why.

The all, the whole thing, the big picture (and it’s really big), we

call it history, but we’re making it now.  So do your thing, I’ll do mine,

and it is.

Somewhere in the middle, balance.  Somewhere else, ingenuity.

Find it.

So adjust the vertical.  Adjust the horizontal.  Steer your ship, don’t be a cow,

be a cowboy.  Life is not a hard left or a hard right, rainbows and unicorns,

or all pitchforks and devil horns either, so get yer face outta that screen,

because it’s your face.  Because you’re an individual person in the hive

collective of humanity, it behooves you to follow your own star and do

you.  All warranties and conditions apply.